MBAKS Housing Toolkit

Every Resource, Linked

Every source cited in the Housing Toolkit, organized to match the sections where each is referenced. Statutes, case law, and bill citations without a direct source link appear in the Toolkit’s Numbered Legal Notes.

⇩ Download the full Toolkit (PDF)

MBAKS Housing Toolkit cover
MAXIMIZING RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES AND MIDDLE HOUSING  — 80 links
Housing Types and Innovation
Allow lot size averaging
Facilitate cottage housing
Align regulations and policies to support multiplexes
Facilitate accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and allow separate ownership
Adopt unit lot subdivision (ULS) code provisions
Facilitate co-living homes
Increase Housing Capacity Near Transit and Jobs
Plan for transit-oriented development
Examples of jurisdictions that exceed Washington’s minimum density baselines near major transit stops include:
Reduce or eliminate mandatory minimum parking requirements near transit
Periodically review underutilized land for potential redesignation and possible rezoning
PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS AND ENHANCING PREDICTABILITY  — 72 links
Application Submittal and Review
Ensure completeness determinations are made timely without substantive review
Establish local vesting of regulations and impact fees
Meet or exceed established permit review timelines
Provide required timeline data
Provide online permitting and real-time tracking
Avoid development moratoria
SEPA Planning Tools
Adopt an exemption for infill development
Conduct subarea planning for transit-oriented development
Use planned actions
Land Division
Allow administrative approval of long subdivisions
Implement administrative lot splitting
Permit Efficiencies and Process Improvements
Allow concurrent review of preliminary plat and civil plans
City of Auburn.
City of Bellevue.
City of Kent.
Eliminate discretionary design review
Allow construction of model homes before final plat approval
Allow virtual inspections
Flexibility in Site Planning and Design
Ensure tree policies are balanced and predictable
City of Kirkland, KZC 95.30.6 (tree code provision re “no net loss”).
Snohomish County: example of tree canopy approach.
Bellevue: Exemplary public/municipal tree retention and replanting program, as well as tree prioritization location.
Adopt flexible form-based codes
Provide road and access flexibility
Provide flexibility for narrower residential streets
Allow flexibility to meet parking requirements
Reduce minimum building setback requirements
OTHER TOOLS AND CONSIDERATIONS  — 42 links
Funding for Affordable Housing
Adopt affordable housing levies
Adopt or expand the Multifamily Tax Exemption (MFTE) program
Impact Fees
Keep impact fees proportional and housing feasible
Other Resources
General
Built Green Resources
General
Found a broken link or an outdated resource? Contact data@mbaks.com.