NEWS & BLOG

Breaking news and resources from across the industry.

MBAKS Blogs:
Homeowners
  • Why Energy Models?

    by User Not Found | Sep 22, 2017
    Third & Valley Rooftop Deck

    Built Green 4-Star project by Denizen Development LLC

    Most builders pursuing Built Green certification quickly realize that the energy model of their project is one of the keys to achieving a given star-level. Almost all Built Green star-levels for nearly all certification types (Community certification and Refit certification being the exceptions) require an energy model.

    How does this work? Why is this the case? Let us explain.

    What is an energy model?

    An energy model is a projection of how much energy a home will use, given its design and equipment. Energy models are extensively researched and widely accepted, but they are also an estimate of how much energy a home will use. There is no way to account for certain variables, occupant behavior being a big one. However, models can be very useful tools for judging a home’s efficiency and for comparing the likely benefits of different efficiency strategies.

    There are many ways to perform an energy model and models may vary in their intricacy, in part due to different software tools that can be used. Built Green’s modeling protocol is based on the software REM/Rate for single-family models and on eQuest for larger, multifamily models. 

    Built Green’s… modeling protocol?

    Yes, Built Green has a modeling protocol to ensure that projects are all being modeled the same way. On top of the different modeling tools, modeling is not an exact science and two different modelers could make two different decisions in how to account for certain components, with neither necessarily incorrect. To standardize our process and make sure that Built Green certification means the same thing for different projects, Built Green introduced modeling protocols to guide third-party verifiers and modeling experts. The protocols are designed with the input of experts and with the aim of making Built Green as accessible as possible for builders, while at the same time ensuring Built Green qualifies for various incentives. Third-party verifiers are a great resource for questions about modeling since they are the ones who often do the model or who work with the person doing the model.

    So why a model?

    Built Green is a certification that represents a building’s environmental gains above code. One of these gains is energy efficiency. Thus, projects need to demonstrate to Built Green that their energy consumption will be less than a similar code home and Built Green needs to demonstrate to governments and utilities that offer green building incentives that the program is meeting expectations. A model does just that.

    What does the model show exactly?

    Since Built Green is a regional certification, we look at improvement beyond the Washington State Energy Code. Models, therefore, show the percentage improvement of a Built Green home over its performance had it only been built to code. In other words, a model shows how much energy a home would use with code-compliant design and equipment and how much energy it would use as actually designed—the difference between the two being the energy reduction achieved by green upgrades and smart design. Built Green requires a 10% improvement over code for 3-Star certification, 20% for 4-Star, and 30% for 5-Star. Emerald Star homes must be net zero energy, which means these homes must consume the same or less energy than they produce via renewable energy in a year. These levels ensure Built Green certification carries meaning and acts a basis for incentives that benefit green builders.

    Models are complicated; there is no doubt about that! Hopefully this post explains their purpose and how Built Green utilizes them. If you want to do a deep dive into the details of our modeling protocol, reach out to your third-party verifier for project specifics or to us for general information!

     

  • Is a Cluttered Closet Robbing You of Precious Hours?

    by Russ Vanover | Sep 21, 2017

    By Kevin and Terri Kartak, AAA KARTAK Glass & Closet

    Q: My bedroom closet is a deep, dark abyss and I'm afraid to venture inside for fear of what I might find. Help!

    A: The first thing to do is to go through your belongings and make the hard decisions on what exactly should be in your closet. Let's be honest here: most of us are not motivated to spend an hour or so on this. It's a value proposition, and we just don't see spending our limited time there, right?

    But what if spending a couple of hours now would save you a day's work every month going forward?

    Have you heard of the Pareto principle? Most people know this as the 80/20 rule. With clothing, for instance, the average person wears 20 percent of their clothing 80 percent of the time. It's an important concept as we look at saving time.

    Is saving time important to you? Studies have shown that the average American spends up to 45 minutes a day just looking for their stuff. What if you could save 20 of those 45 minutes per day? Twenty minutes a day adds up to 10 hours a month. That's like saving a whole day's work every month, just by being more organized. Now that's motivating!

    Keeping these things in mind, take a look at what's in your closet. We recommend isolating the 20 percent of things you wear day in and day out. Get those things together and then look at the rest. Ask yourself, "Which do I want more—this or 10 extra hours a month?" With that kind of motivation, you will soon find yourself removing items.

    Try to get rid of 25–50 percent of those items. For the remainder that you do keep, ask yourself if it belongs in this closet. Perhaps another location will do: a drawer, a box or another less-used closet. The more things you get out of the way, the more of those 45 daily minutes you will be saving.

    Once you've sorted your clothing, it's time to look at what's left, as well as the design of your closet. How many feet of short-hanging clothes do you have? How many feet of long- and medium-length clothing? You can get an attractive closet designed that works around your life, saves you tons of time, and looks fantastic. Saving time and making your home beautiful are always good investments.

    Lastly, how do you maintain this wonderful closet you've created? The secret here is to notice when you bring new clothing home. You will find yourself doing this, and why? The problem is that the 20 percent you wear every day slowly but surely becomes part of the 80 percent that you won't wear often. Clothing wears out. Our sizes change. Seasons change. So when you find yourself bringing clothing home, get rid of the same number of items. Your smart closet will continue to look great and keep you efficient.

     


    Kevin and Terri Kartak own AAA Kartak Glass & Closet and are members of the Master Builders Association of King and Snohomish Counties. HomeWork is the group's weekly column. If you have a home improvement, remodeling, or residential homebuilding question you'd like answered by one of the MBA's more than 2,800 members, write to homework@mbaks.com.

  • EDITORIAL: A moratorium is not the answer to our housing affordability crisis

    by Russ Vanover | Sep 21, 2017

    By Allison Butcher, Master Builders Association, The Lens News

    Over the past 18 months, five King County cities have adopted a building moratorium, temporarily putting the brakes on new home construction.

    While a moratorium is legal, it does not mean it is good policy. At a time when demand for housing is far outpacing housing supply, which drives up both home prices and rents and makes housing less attainable, building moratoria certainly are not good for housing. They also are not good for our economy or the families and workers looking for a home closer to job centers. Furthermore, they potentially could run counter to our region's transportation investments that contemplate the need for more transit-oriented development in certain areas.

    Read article
  • Mercer Island City Council approves size restrictions on new houses

    by Russ Vanover | Sep 21, 2017

    By Marc Stiles, Puget Sound Business Journal (subscription required)

    The size of new houses on Mercer Island will be limited more than anywhere else in the region starting Nov. 1, when new restrictions that the city council approved on Tuesday take effect.

    The council voted 5-1 to update the city's residential design standards and approved a new rule to protect mature trees.

    The code update affects all of the 6,950 single-family lots on the island, which is a choice market for builders of new homes. The island's average household income of $183,200 is the Puget Sound region's second-highest behind Medina, according to Puget Sound Business Journal research.

    New construction and remodeling projects can still be vested under the old code until the end of October, city spokesman Ross Freeman said.

    After that, new homes won't be able to cover more than 40 percent of a lot, down from 45 percent. Maximum heights have been cut from 35 to 30 feet, and at least 30 percent of large trees must be kept when a lot under goes major construction. The rules also limit the amount of "hardscape" surfaces, such as decks and patios, to 9 percent of a lot.

    Residents who pushed for the change raised concerns about how quickly the character of their neighborhoods have been changing, with old houses being replaced by larger ones.

    While the city has been working on the update for about a year, critics say the city rolled out the new rules hither and yon, discussing different changes at different times. They were not discussed as a comprehensive package, according to the Master Builders Association of King and Snohomish Counties, which asked council members to slow down the process and consider their recommendations.

    "This is a lose-lose. The (homebuilding industry) was not heard and the community's primary concerns were not addressed," David Hoffman, a government affairs staff member for the homebuilders, said after Tuesday's council vote.

    People are still going to build big houses that will upset some neighbors, he said.

    Read article
  • Seattle mayoral and city council candidates discuss Seattle housing at Built Green Conference

    by Russ Vanover | Sep 19, 2017

    By Mike Richard, The Lens News

    Two Seattle mayoral candidates and one city council candidate shared their perspectives this week on hot housing topics in the expanding city, including affordable housing, clean energy, and density issues.

    The contenders took part in a panel that discussed ways to make the region “inclusive, resilient and vibrant” as part of Built Green’s 2017 Conference on September 14. The annual event brings construction sector stakeholders together to learn about current best practices and technology for environmentally friendly building.

    Read article
  • Shannon's 60: Jenny Steiner, Builders Interiors

    by Russ Vanover | Sep 18, 2017

    Shannon talks to Jenny Steiner, Builders Interiors, about her company and how their MBA membership helps them continue to grow.

    Check out our member benefits

     

  • Ex-Everett councilman to take job with land-development firm

    by Russ Vanover | Sep 15, 2017

    By The Everett Herald staff

    BELLEVUE—Former Everett Councilman Shannon Affholter is preparing to resign as executive director of the Master Builders Association of King and Snohomish Counties next month to become chief operating officer for a major Pacific Northwest land-development company.

    Read article
  • Built Green Conference offers innovative solutions to sustainability issues

    by Russ Vanover | Sep 14, 2017

    By Bothell-Kenmore Reporter

    The annual Built Green Conference is where builders, policymakers, and others involved in the green building industry go for inspiring and interactive discussions, exchanges of experiences, and practical examples focused on building science, policy, and research in green building and sustainability.

    Read article

  • Shannon's 60: 2017 Housing Summit

    by Russ Vanover | Sep 11, 2017

    This week, Shannon talks to Senior Policy Analyst Allison Butcher about our annual (free!) Housing Summit, where we'll be discussing housing attainability solutions and revealing our 10-point legislative agenda.

    Register now

  • It’s September and Your Form I-9 is Now Outdated

    by User Not Found | Sep 07, 2017

    By Rachel Fausnaught, PrimePay

    It seems like just yesterday the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released an updated Form I-9. The changes are subtle, but still require employers to use the new form.

    Here’s what you need to know.

    Changes to the form

    The USCIS has changed the name of the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices to its new name: Immigrant and Employee Rights Section.

    They also removed the words “the end of” from the phrase “the first day of employment.”

    i9 Employment Eligibility Verification Form

    Revisions to the list of acceptable documents

    The Consular Report of Birth Abroad (Form FS-240) has been added to List C. If you’re filling out the Form I-9 online, you will be able to select this form from the dropdown menus. Using e-verify? You can also select Form FS-240 when creating a case for an employee who presents this document for Form I-9.

    All the certifications of report of birth issued by the Department of State (Form FS-545, Form DS-1350, and Form FS-240) have been combined into selection C #2 in List C. 

    All List C documents except the Social Security card have been renumbered. Example: The employment authorization document issued by the Department of Homeland Security on List C has changed from List C #8 to List C #7.

    What to do

    Employers can continue using the older version through Sept. 17. On Sept. 18, you must use the revised version. You’ll notice the revision date of 07/17/17 N at the bottom of the form. Storage and retention rules for any previously completed Forms I-9 remain the same. Find more details on that here.

    Penalties for noncompliance

    Just last year, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) nearly doubled fines for violations with Forms I-9.

    There is a $216–$2,126 fine per Form I-9 paperwork violation. That’s an increase from $110–$1,100.

    For unlawful employment of unauthorized workers, the fine for the first offense increased to $539–$4,313 per worker from $375–$3,200.

    For unfair immigration-related practices, specifically document abuse, the fine per individual increased to $110-$1,110. Learn more about the fines and penalties.

    Where to find the latest form

    It's in PrimePay's resources section. Access the resources and choose the payroll forms tab.

     


    PrimePay is a member of the Master Builders Association of King and Snohomish Counties. PrimePay empowers small businesses to thrive by offering integrated payroll, HR, and benefits administration with superior support to back it. Learn more at primepay.com.

    The original article was published by PrimePay.

RESOURCES AND GUIDES

Help us build a sound future.